Contents
Introduction
Divorce and child custody cases are often difficult
and emotionally taxing for all parties involved. It is important to
have an attorney who is sensitive to your needs, and who can formulate
a plan to protect your rights and assets. Usually both parties suffer
financially as a result of divorce.
There are two types of divorce lawyer you should watch
out for. One will bring a meritless child custody action in an effort
to coerce the other partner into giving up more property. The other
will bring frequent motions, and will manufacture conflicts, for the
sole purpose of justifying a larger bill. Please pick your divorce
lawyer carefully.
The Waiting Period
After you file for a divorce involving minor children,
there is a 180-day statutory waiting or "cooling off" period
before the trial court may enter a judgment of divorce. While it is
possible for a trial court to find circumstances which justify waiving
this period, in most cases the full 180-day waiting period will be
observed. Ordinarily, a trial court will enter "temporary orders"
for custody, parenting time (visitation), and child support, while
the divorce is pending.
The "Best Interest Factors"
When evaluating child custody, Michigan courts are required
to evaluate the "best interest" factors, a series of considerations
which are meant to help the court determine the most appropriate custodial
environment for a child. Those factors include:
(a) The love, affection, and other emotional ties existing
between the parties involved and the child.
(b) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved
to give the child love, affection, and guidance and to continue
the education and raising of the child in his or her religion or
creed, if any.
(c) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved
to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care or other
remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state
in place of medical care, and other material needs.
(d) The length of time the child has lived in a stable,
satisfactory environment, and the desirability of maintaining continuity.
(e) The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing
or proposed custodial home or homes.
(f) The moral fitness of the parties involved.
(g) The mental and physical health of the parties
involved.
(h) The home, school, and community record of the
child.
(i) The reasonable preference of the child, if the
court considers the child to be of sufficient age to express preference.
(j) The willingness and ability of each of the parties
to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child
relationship between the child and the other parent or the child
and the parents.
(k) Domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence
was directed against or witnessed by the child.
(l) Any other factor considered by the court to be
relevant to a particular child custody dispute.
Please note that, while a court will make specific findings
under each "best interest" factor when rendering a custody
decision, the court's findings are not tallied up like a baseball
score. It may be that one party "wins" under most of the
factors, but that custody is awarded to the other party on the basis
of a factor the trial court considers to be more important under the
circumstances. For example, a judge may be sufficiently concerned
about a parent who appears to wish to alienate the child from the
other parent, that custody will be awarded to the other parent under
a strong "factor j" finding, despite the many good qualities
of the first parent. Similarly, "factor b" and "factor
c" findings may be given considerable weight by a court, if a
parent appears unwilling or unable to provide appropriate guidance
or support.
The issue of "morality" relates to the effect
of the parent's moral choices on the children. It is not intended
to include an evaluation of a parent's character outside of the context
of the best interests of the children, and the ability of the parent
to provide appropriate moral guidance to the children. A parent's
involvement in a new romantic relationship following divorce or separation
is not the type of "moral conduct" which would ordinarily
concern a court.
Modification of Custody
Once a trial court has entered a custody order, the
trial court is not supposed to revisit that order unless the party
requesting modification can establish a "change of circumstances"
sufficient to reopen the prior custody decision. The idea behind this
rule is that minor children need stability in their lives, and thus
that modification of custody is not appropriate if there has been
no significant change in their existing custodial environment. A lawyer
can help you evaluate if there have been sufficient changes to warrant
an effort to change or modify custody.
Interstate Custody Issues
Interstate custody disputes typically arise when a parent
who lives with the children in Michigan files for divorce in a Michigan
court, or when a parent who was divorced in a different state seeks
to modify that state's child custody judgment in a Michigan court.
In the first circumstance, a Michigan court will be able to grant
a divorce and issue a custody order, but may be restricted in its
ability to divide marital assets or to award child support without
the other parent's consent to its jurisdiction. In the second circumstance,
there are some relatively complicated rules which are meant to protect
the jurisdiction of the court which issued the original custody order,
which may prevent a Michigan court from modifying that order. If there
are interstate issues in your custody case, due to the complications
that can result, it is a good idea to consult with a lawyer about
their impact on your case.
Calculation of Child Support
Child support is ordinarily calculated in accord with
the Michigan Child Support Formula. This calculation is formulaic,
and except in high income cases does not leave much room for advocacy.
Child support is ordinarily payable until a child reaches the age
of eighteen, or until the age of 19-1/2 if the child is still a full-time
high school student. Please note that the parties can agree to additional
support provisions on a contractual basis, for example if they wish
to provide for their children's college education as part of the divorce
agreement, or if they have a disabled child whom they know will require
support well past the age of majority.
If you are paying or receiving child support, and your
financial circumstances change, you may ask the court to modify the
amount of child support payable in your case. Please note that under
normal circumstances a court will be unable to modify support "retroactively"
- that is, any change will ordinarily take effect as of the date of
your petition for a modification. It is thus important that you present
any challenge to excessive or inadequate support as soon as the changed
circumstances come to your attention.
Joint Custody
There are two types of "joint custody" in
Michigan - "joint legal custody", under which parents share
decision-making responsibility in relation to important life decisions
affecting the child, and "joint physical custody", which
usually involves a more equal parenting time arrangement and shared
responsibility for the day-to-day care of the child. A Michigan court
must consider joint custody if asked to do so by either parent. Most
custody cases result in an award of joint legal custody. Joint physical
custody works best when the parents have a strong relationship and
ability to communicate in relation to their minor children, despite
the circumstances of their divorce.
Moving After a Custody Order
Custodial parents who are subject to a Michigan custody
order are expected to seek permission from the trial court before
relocating the children to another state. Where the parents with either
joint physical or joint legal custody live within 100 miles of each
other at the time of the initial custody order, either parent must
petition the court before they move beyond that 100 mile limit.